What you do with horse's that can't be ridden?
Horse Management Thread, What you do with horse's that can't be ridden? in Horses and Ponies; Rem at the risk of sounding arguementative, if you can't afford to keep the horse you may not even be ...
01-07-2009, 09:41 PM
|
#61
|
|
Advanced Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Albany
Posts: 7,947
|
Rem at the risk of sounding arguementative, if you can't afford to keep the horse you may not even be able to afford the vet to put the horse down let alone have it cremated. The few dollars that you may get from the pet food people may in fact buy food for the rest of the family.
Its not a perfect world and often a very sad and cruel one for both horse and owner.
__________________
.............................................
|
|
|
01-07-2009, 10:00 PM
|
#62
|
|
Advanced Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Swan Valley WA
Posts: 872
|
That's one of the reasons that my horses are insured for vet expenses and also a small replacement cost which would cover the cremation expenses. We aren't able to bury horses on our property because we are on the Gnangara Mound and there is no way I would let them go to landfill.
It can be a cruel world Sharaway but I see no reason to add to it and I will always do my utmost to protect my horses from it.
|
|
|
02-07-2009, 10:30 AM
|
#63
|
|
Advanced Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Gidge
Posts: 3,559
|
As soon as I get the dosh I'm going to sort out insurance.
My mum was going to pay to get Ted cremated ... until she realised how much it cost.
I was living in a rental at the time, which was only going to be sub divided anyway, mum's property I would have LOVED Ted to be buried there. But we live on solid rock and the time it would have taken to sort out some heavy machinery to dig a hole....well it was 40 degree heat and we couldn't wait any longer.
So my OH organised the guys with the truck - gosh I can't even remember who it was, such a blur! and yeah I guess Ted went to landfill. Even if he had not been pumped full of drugs and greendreamed, I couldn't possibly have let him go for meat. Not my best friend.
__________________
Rest in Peace Ted
22nd September 1996 ~ 2nd January 2009
|
|
|
03-07-2009, 10:18 AM
|
#64
|
|
Full Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 109
|
I have 2 horses, both are retired. One is 33 the other is 14. Both retired due to different reasons. But the last thing i would think of doing would be to get rid of them. Both are fine in the paddock, can canter comfortably and half the time you wouldnt know that they are unridable. I havent ridden a horse in nearly 6 years. And there is nothing I like more than going and spending time with them, grooming, feeding, watching them graze. Nothing beats that.
Im lucky that my mum is also very horsey and understands the bonds you have with a horse (unlike my other half who insists i am wasting money) if the situation came down to it and for some reason i couldnt support them, mum would take over until i am back on my feet.
|
|
|
03-07-2009, 12:32 PM
|
#65
|
|
Advanced Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,656
|
Quote:
|
unable to be ridden due to an injury or a confrontation fault. They are not in pain just can't be ridden.
|
At what point does a horse that is not in any pain become unfit for riding? Who makes the call that they are not in any pain? And who makes the call that they can't be ridden?
I think these questions are ones for your employers. They are probably alot smarter than me.
|
|
|
04-07-2009, 08:11 AM
|
#66
|
|
Advanced Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: In a Stable!!!
Posts: 3,344
|
Pat them feed them, LOL Same thing I do with my broodies and young horses.
I would never give a horse away as a lawnmower or companion, If the perfect home came along then I would lease them out so that I knew the right thing would be done with them. (2 ponies I havent seen for yrs but I know they are safe) Otherwise if I could no longer keep them i would PTS.
THat way I can always guarntee quality of life.
|
|
|
04-07-2009, 09:01 AM
|
#67
|
|
Advanced Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Roleystone
Posts: 5,103
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caroline
To keep, or not to keep, a horse when it is no longer rideable is purely the decision of the owner, and no one else!
Noone should pressure, hassle or criticise someone for doing what they chose to do or believe in. It is a personal decision based upon many factors - quality of life, time, $$$$$, paddock room, other horse/competition/work/family commitments, ongoing feed, farrier and vet $$$$ etc. 
|
Well said Caroline. Paddy will be kept with me even in retirement until his quality of life is no longer there. I am lucky, I have my own property and can afford to keep him. Some of us don't have that luxury and agist and therefore only can afford 1 horse.
I would prefer to put mine down then risk passing them on for free and not knowing what happened or seeing them not looking so good. I used to be trusting and give horses away for free (usually rideable Stbs that came off the track that I would start under saddle and rehome), the number I have found later not looking so good, I know why a lot of trainers choose to put them down now.
__________________
Good thing I don’t have kids, cause my horses ate their college fund
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +8. The time now is 05:03 AM.
|